Filter

Let us know how we can improve Filter. Every submission is reviewed and helps guide what we build. Vote on the ideas that matter most to you.
Feature Request: Display Specific Access List and Custom Category Names in Web Activity
Issue Web Activity reporting does not always identify the specific custom configuration object responsible for an allow or block decision. Administrators may see a generic result such as: Access List Custom List Custom Category without being shown the exact Access List or custom object that caused the decision. This creates unnecessary ambiguity during troubleshooting and policy review. Current Limitation Web Activity already exposes useful decision information, including whether traffic was allowed or blocked by category or Access List. However, the report does not consistently display the specific Access List name associated with the decision. This means an administrator can know that an Access List affected the request without knowing which Access List was actually responsible. Operational Impact Generic attribution increases the time required to troubleshoot filtering behavior. When reviewing a blocked or allowed request, administrators may need to: search through multiple Access Lists; review policy assignments manually; compare several possible custom categories; reconstruct the decision path outside the activity record. This is especially inefficient in environments with many custom lists and policies. The activity record should provide enough information to explain the filtering decision directly. Requested Enhancement Add explicit object-level attribution to Web Activity reporting. Where a filtering decision is caused by a custom object, the report should identify the exact object name. Examples: Current Blocked by: Access List Preferred Blocked by: Access List — Student Gaming Block Current Allowed by: Custom List Preferred Allowed by: Access List — Approved Instructional Resources Current Blocked by: Custom Category Preferred Blocked by: Custom Category — District Restricted Services Reporting Fields Where applicable, Web Activity should expose: decision type; exact Access List name; exact Custom Category name; applicable policy; allow/block result; other relevant policy object responsible for the final decision. If multiple objects contributed to the result, the report should identify the final controlling object and, where practical, the relevant decision path. Preferred UI Design The exact object name should be visible directly in Web Activity without requiring administrators to navigate into multiple additional console areas. This could be implemented as: a dedicated Access List column; a dedicated Decision Source column; an expandable decision-details view; clickable object names linking directly to the relevant configuration. A dedicated Access List column would align well with the existing reporting model. Export Requirement The specific object name should also be included in exported Web Activity data. If the console identifies the Access List or Custom Category responsible for a request, that information should remain available when the report is exported for troubleshooting, auditing, or analysis. Requested Outcome Provide clear attribution of the exact custom object responsible for an allow or block decision. The desired behavior is: Decision type + exact object name rather than: Generic object type only Acceptance Criteria This request would be considered addressed when: Web Activity identifies the specific Access List responsible for an allow or block decision. Custom Category names are displayed where applicable. Generic labels such as “Custom List” are not used when the specific object is known. The object name is visible directly in Web Activity or an immediately accessible details view. The same attribution is preserved in exported Web Activity data. Administrators can quickly identify which configuration object produced the reported result. Business Value This enhancement would: reduce troubleshooting time; improve policy transparency; make Web Activity more useful as an administrative diagnostic tool; reduce manual policy correlation; improve auditing and reporting; allow administrators to understand filtering decisions directly from the activity record. The requested improvement is simple: If Lightspeed knows which custom list or category made the decision, Web Activity should show its name.
·
Reporting & Logs
·
under review
Feature Request: Agent Version Compliance and Deployment Health Dashboard
Issue Telemetry provides valuable endpoint information, but administrators still need to transform that information into an operational understanding of deployment health. WCPSS already has separate needs around identifying agents that stop reporting and around filtering/exporting Telemetry at organizational scale. A dedicated Agent Version Compliance dashboard would provide an immediate answer to a different operational question: How healthy is the current Lightspeed agent deployment across the organization? Requested Enhancement Add a dashboard that summarizes agent deployment and version compliance across managed endpoints. The dashboard should provide an immediate overview of: current agent version; previous version; outdated versions; unsupported versions; stale agents; devices that have never successfully reported; recent check-in status; version distribution by platform. Example Dashboard Windows Agent Compliance Current Version: 3.4.3 Current: 91.4% Previous Version: 6.8% Older Versions: 1.1% Stale / No Recent Check-In: 0.7% ChromeOS Current: 96.2% Previous: 2.7% Stale: 1.1% These values should be selectable so administrators can drill into the underlying devices. Organizational Filtering The dashboard should allow administrators to scope results by: school/location; operating system; organizational group; agent version; reporting state; last check-in range. This is especially important for determining whether a deployment problem is: district-wide; platform-specific; school-specific; isolated to a deployment group. Deployment Validation The dashboard should help administrators quickly identify conditions such as: rollout stalled at one school; significant population remains one version behind; devices stopped checking in after an update; one platform has a materially lower adoption rate; an expected deployment has not reached its intended population. Drill-Down Selecting any dashboard metric should open the underlying device population. Example: 327 Devices — Version 3.4.2 Selecting that result should provide the corresponding Telemetry records rather than requiring the administrator to reconstruct the query manually. Compliance Thresholds District administrators should be able to establish operational thresholds. Example: Compliant: Current version Warning: One version behind Noncompliant: More than one version behind Stale: No report in 7 days Lightspeed could then provide an overall deployment-health status. Requested Outcome Transform existing Telemetry information into an actionable agent-deployment health view. The desired model is: Telemetry tells us about individual devices. Agent Compliance tells us whether the deployment is healthy. Acceptance Criteria Current agent-version distribution is visible. Results can be separated by operating system. Stale/non-reporting agents are identifiable. Administrators can filter by location or organizational scope. Dashboard metrics support drill-down to affected devices. Version-compliance thresholds can be configured where practical. Results can be exported or used in scheduled reporting. Business Value This enhancement would: improve proactive agent management; make deployments easier to validate; identify rollout failures earlier; reduce reactive support; improve upgrade planning; provide enterprise-scale fleet visibility.
·
Reporting & Logs
·
under review
Load More
→