Filter

Let us know how we can improve Filter. Every submission is reviewed and helps guide what we build. Vote on the ideas that matter most to you.
District Branding Standard for Parent Portal, Emails, Reports, and Family-Facing Communications
Issue The Lightspeed Parent Portal is a district-provided service used directly by parents and guardians, but the current presentation provides limited ability for the district to apply its own organizational branding consistently across the experience. Because Parent Portal instances are district-specific and presented through their own tenant/domain context, it appears reasonable for branding to be configurable at the district level and then inherited across the family-facing experience. WCPSS would like Lightspeed to establish a district branding standard for Parent Portal rather than limiting customization to a single landing page. The objective is to ensure that parents immediately recognize the service as an official WCPSS resource while still clearly identifying Lightspeed as the technology provider. Requested Enhancement Provide centralized tenant-level branding controls that apply across Parent Portal and associated family-facing communications. At minimum, district branding should be supported in: Parent Portal landing page; authenticated Parent Portal experience; Parent Portal headers and navigation; automated parent emails; scheduled or generated reports; parent-facing notifications; downloadable reports or PDFs; support/instructional messaging generated by Parent Portal; other family-facing Parent Portal communications. Preferred Branding Hierarchy The primary visual identity should be the district. For example: WCPSS Logo Wake County Public School System Parent Portal with secondary attribution such as: Powered by Lightspeed The relationship communicated to families should be: WCPSS provides the service — Lightspeed powers the platform. Lightspeed attribution should remain visible and appropriate, but it should not visually compete with the organization delivering the service to the family. Centralized Branding Configuration District administrators should be able to define branding once and have it applied consistently throughout the Parent Portal ecosystem. Suggested settings include: Organization Identity District Name District Logo Parent Portal Display Name Optional district tagline Brand Appearance Primary color Secondary/accent color Header color Link/button color Logo alignment Logo sizing Light/dark logo variant where supported Messaging Welcome text Introductory instructions Support/contact information District help URL Optional footer text Terms or district-specific informational messaging where appropriate Vendor Attribution A standard secondary attribution such as: Powered by Lightspeed should remain available throughout the experience. Parent Portal Landing Page The landing page should allow the district logo and identity to serve as the primary visual header. Preferred hierarchy: District Logo District Name Parent Portal content / sign-in experience Powered by Lightspeed This would make the portal immediately recognizable as an official district service. Authenticated Parent Portal District branding should persist after authentication. The experience should not transition from a district-branded landing page into a substantially different vendor-branded application. Applicable elements could include: header; navigation; logo; accent colors; support information; footer; district name. The entire parent experience should feel like one consistent service. Parent Emails and Notifications Emails generated by Parent Portal should also use district branding. Where practical, parent communications should support: district logo; district name; district brand colors; district support/contact information; district-specific footer; secondary Powered by Lightspeed attribution. For example, a weekly Parent Portal email should visually communicate that it is an official WCPSS communication rather than appearing primarily as an unrelated vendor email. This is important for: parent trust; recognition; adoption; phishing awareness; consistency with district communications. Reports and Downloadable Content Reports generated for parents should inherit the same branding standard. Applicable outputs could include: activity reports; scheduled reports; downloadable PDFs; summaries; notifications containing report content. At minimum, generated reports should be capable of displaying: district logo; district name; report title; district colors or approved header treatment; support/contact information; Powered by Lightspeed attribution. Branding Consistency Standard The preferred design principle is: Configure district branding once → apply it everywhere Parent Portal communicates with families. The district should not need to separately recreate branding for: the portal; emails; reports; notifications; downloadable content. The same approved tenant-level branding configuration should be reused wherever practical. Tenant / Domain Feasibility Because Parent Portal instances are already associated with individual district tenants and domains, a tenant-scoped branding profile appears to be a reasonable approach. A potential model would be: District Tenant → Branding Profile → Landing Page → Authenticated Portal → Emails → Reports → Notifications This would allow each organization to maintain its own identity without affecting other Lightspeed customers. The exact implementation is for Lightspeed to determine, but the district-specific nature of the Parent Portal makes centralized tenant branding a practical feature request. Administrative Controls Branding configuration should be restricted to appropriately authorized administrators. Where possible, administrators should also be able to: preview changes before publishing; restore default branding; upload replacement logos; validate logo dimensions; preview email presentation; preview report presentation; ensure text remains readable against configured colors. Accessibility Custom branding should preserve accessibility requirements. Lightspeed should retain safeguards for: sufficient color contrast; readable text; accessible buttons and links; appropriate logo scaling; responsive layouts. District branding should enhance identity without degrading usability. Requested Outcome Establish a Parent Portal branding standard where district identity is centrally configured and consistently applied across all parent-facing experiences. The desired model is: WCPSS-branded portal WCPSS-branded emails WCPSS-branded reports WCPSS-branded notifications with consistent: Powered by Lightspeed attribution. Acceptance Criteria This request would be considered addressed when: District administrators can upload and configure a district logo. The district logo can serve as the primary visual identity on the Parent Portal landing page. District branding persists throughout the authenticated Parent Portal. Automated Parent Portal emails can inherit district branding. Generated reports and downloadable documents can inherit district branding. Parent-facing notifications can display district identity where supported. District name, colors, support information, and approved messaging can be centrally configured. Branding can be managed as a tenant-level configuration rather than recreated separately in each feature. Lightspeed attribution remains visible in a secondary Powered by Lightspeed position. Branding configuration preserves accessibility and responsive design standards. Administrators can preview branding before publishing changes. Business Value This enhancement would: establish immediate parent trust; make Parent Portal clearly identifiable as an official district service; improve consistency across all family-facing communications; reduce confusion between district and vendor ownership; strengthen parent adoption; improve phishing awareness by making legitimate communications visually recognizable; reduce duplicated branding configuration; allow Lightspeed to remain appropriately credited without dominating the parent-facing experience. The standard should be simple: Our families should see our district identity everywhere they interact with the service — with Lightspeed clearly and professionally shown as the platform powering it.
·
Parent Portal
Feature Request: Enterprise Scheduled Reporting and Automated Data Delivery
Issue Scheduled reporting should not be limited to simply emailing a static report at predetermined intervals. For a large district, reporting requirements vary significantly by audience, dataset size, security requirements, and operational workflow. WCPSS already identified scheduled export as a potential alternative for Leadership Dashboard access, but direct dashboard access remains preferable because repeatedly exporting information is inefficient. The same problem becomes even more significant with large operational datasets such as Telemetry, where the current export model is already constrained by a 50,000-device limit. Lightspeed needs a more comprehensive report automation and delivery framework rather than a simple “email this report weekly” capability. Requested Enhancement Allow administrators to define reusable report jobs containing: Dataset Examples: Web Activity Telemetry Agent Health Agent Version Compliance Leadership Dashboard Smart Shield activity other applicable administrative reports Scope Examples: district-wide; specific school/location; organizational group; platform; policy; agent version; category; custom filter set. Schedule Examples: daily; weekly; monthly; specific day/time; administrator-defined recurrence. Output Examples: CSV PDF structured data dashboard snapshot secure downloadable report Large-Dataset Challenge Traditional scheduled reporting creates a particular problem for large organizations. A report may contain: tens of thousands of records; hundreds of thousands of records; datasets too large for email; datasets exceeding synchronous export limits; information inappropriate for ordinary email attachment delivery. Therefore, the reporting framework should support multiple delivery methods rather than assuming every scheduled report can be attached to an email. Alternative Delivery Methods Lightspeed should consider supporting several enterprise-scale delivery options. Secure Report Repository Generate the report asynchronously and make it available within Lightspeed. Example: Scheduled Reports Report Generated Records Status Weekly Telemetry Aug 14 182,416 Ready Stale Agents Aug 14 1,243 Ready Authorized administrators could then download the report. Email could simply notify the recipient: Your scheduled report is ready. This avoids email attachment-size limits and unnecessary exposure of sensitive data. Partitioned Report Generation For exceptionally large datasets, Lightspeed could automatically generate multiple files. Example: Telemetry_001.csv Telemetry_002.csv Telemetry_003.csv The administrator receives the complete dataset without the interactive console needing to generate one enormous synchronous export. Cloud or Secure File Delivery For customers requiring automated downstream processing, Lightspeed could support secure delivery to an approved destination such as: SFTP; secure object storage; other supported enterprise file-delivery endpoint. This would allow districts to automate ingestion without requiring someone to manually download every report. API-Based Scheduled Data Job Where the Lightspeed API is licensed and available, the schedule could generate a predefined dataset accessible programmatically. This could be particularly useful for: SIEM ingestion; asset reconciliation; Power BI or other reporting platforms; internal data warehouses. Email Delivery for Smaller Reports Email should remain an option for appropriately sized reports. However, it should be one delivery mechanism rather than the architecture of the scheduled-reporting feature. Saved Report Definitions Administrators should be able to save a report definition independently of its schedule. Example: Report Name: Windows Agent Compliance – School Group A Filters: OS = Windows Version ≠ Current Location Group = Group A The administrator could: Run Now Schedule Clone Modify Export This would eliminate repetitive filter recreation. Delta Reporting For operational reports, an additional valuable option would be: Only include records that changed since the previous run. Examples: agents newly stale since yesterday; devices newly below required version; new blocks in a monitored category; newly detected unmanaged devices. For large districts, delta reporting can be far more actionable than repeatedly receiving the complete dataset. Exception-Based Reporting Another useful mode would be to generate a report only when a condition is met. Examples: stale agents exceed 2%; more than 500 devices remain below current version; a school falls below 90% agent compliance; report contains at least one matching record. This avoids generating meaningless reports when there is nothing requiring attention. Recipient and Access Controls Scheduled reports should respect Least Privilege Access. Administrators should be able to specify approved recipients or roles without granting those recipients broader console access. Sensitive reports should preferably use secure in-console delivery rather than attaching student or device-level data directly to email. Report History Lightspeed should retain a configurable history of generated scheduled reports including: report name; requested by; generated date/time; reporting period; record count; completion status; delivery status; expiration date. This provides accountability and allows administrators to retrieve a recently generated report without rerunning it. Failure Handling Scheduled reporting should clearly identify failures. Examples: Completed Completed with Partial Data Failed No Matching Records If a scheduled report cannot retrieve all expected data, it should never silently produce an incomplete dataset. Administrators should be notified when: generation fails; the dataset is truncated; delivery fails; authorization changes prevent delivery. Requested Outcome Create an enterprise scheduled-reporting framework that supports both traditional reports and large operational datasets. The preferred model is: Define Dataset → Apply Scope → Save → Schedule → Generate Asynchronously → Deliver Through the Appropriate Channel rather than: Run report → attach CSV to email Acceptance Criteria This request would be considered substantially addressed when: Administrators can save reusable report definitions. Reports can be scheduled on recurring intervals. Filters and organizational scope are preserved. Reports can be generated asynchronously. Large reports are not constrained by normal email attachment limits. Secure in-console report delivery is supported. Alternative enterprise delivery methods can be supported where appropriate. Administrators can generate complete datasets through partitioning or another scalable method. Email remains available for appropriately sized reports. Delta reporting is supported where practical. Condition/exception-based reporting is supported where practical. Report generation and delivery status are visible. Incomplete or truncated reports are explicitly identified. Scheduled reports respect Least Privilege Access. Report history is retained for an administratively defined period. Business Value An enterprise reporting framework would: reduce repetitive administrative work; provide leadership and technical teams with timely information; make reporting practical at large-district scale; remove dependency on interactive export limits; support operational automation; reduce sensitive-data exposure through email; enable downstream analytics and reconciliation; make Lightspeed reporting useful as an ongoing operational service rather than a manual console task. For a district operating at WCPSS scale, scheduled reporting needs to mean more than “email me this CSV every Monday.” It should mean: Get the right information to the right audience, at the right time, through a delivery method capable of handling the data.
·
Reporting & Logs
Feature Request: Agent Version Compliance and Deployment Health Dashboard
Issue Telemetry provides valuable endpoint information, but administrators still need to transform that information into an operational understanding of deployment health. WCPSS already has separate needs around identifying agents that stop reporting and around filtering/exporting Telemetry at organizational scale. A dedicated Agent Version Compliance dashboard would provide an immediate answer to a different operational question: How healthy is the current Lightspeed agent deployment across the organization? Requested Enhancement Add a dashboard that summarizes agent deployment and version compliance across managed endpoints. The dashboard should provide an immediate overview of: current agent version; previous version; outdated versions; unsupported versions; stale agents; devices that have never successfully reported; recent check-in status; version distribution by platform. Example Dashboard Windows Agent Compliance Current Version: 3.4.3 Current: 91.4% Previous Version: 6.8% Older Versions: 1.1% Stale / No Recent Check-In: 0.7% ChromeOS Current: 96.2% Previous: 2.7% Stale: 1.1% These values should be selectable so administrators can drill into the underlying devices. Organizational Filtering The dashboard should allow administrators to scope results by: school/location; operating system; organizational group; agent version; reporting state; last check-in range. This is especially important for determining whether a deployment problem is: district-wide; platform-specific; school-specific; isolated to a deployment group. Deployment Validation The dashboard should help administrators quickly identify conditions such as: rollout stalled at one school; significant population remains one version behind; devices stopped checking in after an update; one platform has a materially lower adoption rate; an expected deployment has not reached its intended population. Drill-Down Selecting any dashboard metric should open the underlying device population. Example: 327 Devices — Version 3.4.2 Selecting that result should provide the corresponding Telemetry records rather than requiring the administrator to reconstruct the query manually. Compliance Thresholds District administrators should be able to establish operational thresholds. Example: Compliant: Current version Warning: One version behind Noncompliant: More than one version behind Stale: No report in 7 days Lightspeed could then provide an overall deployment-health status. Requested Outcome Transform existing Telemetry information into an actionable agent-deployment health view. The desired model is: Telemetry tells us about individual devices. Agent Compliance tells us whether the deployment is healthy. Acceptance Criteria Current agent-version distribution is visible. Results can be separated by operating system. Stale/non-reporting agents are identifiable. Administrators can filter by location or organizational scope. Dashboard metrics support drill-down to affected devices. Version-compliance thresholds can be configured where practical. Results can be exported or used in scheduled reporting. Business Value This enhancement would: improve proactive agent management; make deployments easier to validate; identify rollout failures earlier; reduce reactive support; improve upgrade planning; provide enterprise-scale fleet visibility.
·
Reporting & Logs
Load More